Вестник БГУ. Филология
Библиографическое описание:
CONTEMPLATION ON THE THEORY OF DIALOGUE FROM A BIOCOGNITVE APPROACH TO LANGUAGE // Вестник БГУ. Филология. - 2025. №1. . - С. 39-44.
Заглавие:
CONTEMPLATION ON THE THEORY OF DIALOGUE FROM A BIOCOGNITVE APPROACH TO LANGUAGE
Финансирование:
Коды:
Аннотация:
The current research essay discusses the issues raised by M. Kent and A. Lane in their analysis of the public relations scholarship on the application of dialogue theory.
The scholars highlighted that dialogue as a phenomenon has been investigated in vari-ous
disciplines, including philosophy, psychology, ethics, phenomenology, public sphere studies, public relations, and others. We suggest to draw upon the research approach of biology of cognition used in linguistics to explore this phenomenon. We believe it can be insightful for public relations research as at the core of all communication disci-plines including strategic communication, PR and organization studies lies language and what people do with it.
The scholars highlighted that dialogue as a phenomenon has been investigated in vari-ous
disciplines, including philosophy, psychology, ethics, phenomenology, public sphere studies, public relations, and others. We suggest to draw upon the research approach of biology of cognition used in linguistics to explore this phenomenon. We believe it can be insightful for public relations research as at the core of all communication disci-plines including strategic communication, PR and organization studies lies language and what people do with it.
Ключевые слова:
biology of cognition, cognitive linguistics, dialogue theory, mediated communication, public relations.
Список литературы:
1. Arnett R. C. Communication and community: implications of Martin Buber’s dia-logue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986.
2. Bohm D. On Dialogue. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
3. Clark A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1552.001.0001.
4. Cowley S. J. Distributed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. DOI: 10.1075/bct.34.01cow.
5. Donald M. Origins of the Modern Mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
6. Jenkins L. Biolinguistics: exploring the biology of language. Cambridge, M.A.: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
7. Kent M. & Lane A. Two-way communication, symmetry, negative spaces, and dia-logue. Public Relations Review. 2021; 47(2): 1–9.
8. Kent M. L., & Taylor M. Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review. 1998; 24(3): 321–334.
9. Kravchenko A. V. Biology of cognition and linguistic analysis. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2008. URL: http://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01272-9.
10. Lamb S. The Anatomy of Language. A workshop presented at the 2nd Biennial Con-ferences on Cognitive Science. 9–13 June, St.-Petersburg, 2006.
11. Linell P. Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: is there a convergence be-tween dialogism and neuro-biology? Language Sciences. 2007; 29: 605–620. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.001.
12. Maturana H. and Varella F. The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala, 1987.
13. Maturana H., Mpodozis J. and Leterier J. C. Brain, language, and the origin of hu-man mental functions. Biological Research. 1995; 28: 15–26.
14. Maturana H. R. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understand-ing. New Science Library. Shambhala Publications, 1987.
15. Morris C. W. Writings on the General Theory of Signs (ed. By T. A. Sebeok). The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 1971.
16. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1990.
17. Raczaszek-Leonardi J. Symbols as constraints. The Structuring Role of Dynamics and Self-Organization. Natural Language. Pragmatics and Cognition. 2009; 17(3): 653–676. doi: 10.1075/pc.17.3.09ras.
18. Russel B. Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1948.
19. Steffensen S. V. Language, languaging, and the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Re-view of Clark (2008). Pragmatics & Cognition. 2009; 17(3): 677–697. doi: 10.1075/pc.17.3.10ste.
2. Bohm D. On Dialogue. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
3. Clark A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1552.001.0001.
4. Cowley S. J. Distributed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. DOI: 10.1075/bct.34.01cow.
5. Donald M. Origins of the Modern Mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
6. Jenkins L. Biolinguistics: exploring the biology of language. Cambridge, M.A.: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
7. Kent M. & Lane A. Two-way communication, symmetry, negative spaces, and dia-logue. Public Relations Review. 2021; 47(2): 1–9.
8. Kent M. L., & Taylor M. Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review. 1998; 24(3): 321–334.
9. Kravchenko A. V. Biology of cognition and linguistic analysis. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2008. URL: http://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01272-9.
10. Lamb S. The Anatomy of Language. A workshop presented at the 2nd Biennial Con-ferences on Cognitive Science. 9–13 June, St.-Petersburg, 2006.
11. Linell P. Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: is there a convergence be-tween dialogism and neuro-biology? Language Sciences. 2007; 29: 605–620. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.001.
12. Maturana H. and Varella F. The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala, 1987.
13. Maturana H., Mpodozis J. and Leterier J. C. Brain, language, and the origin of hu-man mental functions. Biological Research. 1995; 28: 15–26.
14. Maturana H. R. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understand-ing. New Science Library. Shambhala Publications, 1987.
15. Morris C. W. Writings on the General Theory of Signs (ed. By T. A. Sebeok). The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 1971.
16. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1990.
17. Raczaszek-Leonardi J. Symbols as constraints. The Structuring Role of Dynamics and Self-Organization. Natural Language. Pragmatics and Cognition. 2009; 17(3): 653–676. doi: 10.1075/pc.17.3.09ras.
18. Russel B. Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1948.
19. Steffensen S. V. Language, languaging, and the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Re-view of Clark (2008). Pragmatics & Cognition. 2009; 17(3): 677–697. doi: 10.1075/pc.17.3.10ste.
Статья.pdf