Bulletin of BSU. Philology
Bibliographic description:
DENOMINATIONS FOR ALCOHOLIC INEBRIATION IN THE LIGHT OF SYSTEMIC STUDY OF LEXIS // Bulletin of BSU. Philology. - 2024. №4. . - С. 12-18.
Title:
DENOMINATIONS FOR ALCOHOLIC INEBRIATION IN THE LIGHT OF SYSTEMIC STUDY OF LEXIS
Financing:
Codes:
Annotation:
The article is devoted to a contrastive typology of equivalent verbs in Russian and Czech, related to alcoholic drinking. The study includes a research into the denotative meaning
of verbs of inebriation, as well as the motivating components constituting the inner forms
of these verbs in the contrasted languages. The analysis is based on the integrative ap-proach incorporating the semantic field theory, the theory of componential analysis and the theory
of prototypes. This method allows one to present the results of milestone analysis as a study of contrastive typology, particularly a typology of syntactic relations between the semantic predicate and its actants, a typology of componential structures in accord-ance with the semantic components making up lexical meaning, a typology of motivat-ing components reflecting the prototype of denomination. The contrastive analysis shows prevalence of cross-linguistic
similarity over divergence between the Russian and the Czech languages, especially re-garding prototypically structured idioms denoting excessive alcoholic inebriation.
of verbs of inebriation, as well as the motivating components constituting the inner forms
of these verbs in the contrasted languages. The analysis is based on the integrative ap-proach incorporating the semantic field theory, the theory of componential analysis and the theory
of prototypes. This method allows one to present the results of milestone analysis as a study of contrastive typology, particularly a typology of syntactic relations between the semantic predicate and its actants, a typology of componential structures in accord-ance with the semantic components making up lexical meaning, a typology of motivat-ing components reflecting the prototype of denomination. The contrastive analysis shows prevalence of cross-linguistic
similarity over divergence between the Russian and the Czech languages, especially re-garding prototypically structured idioms denoting excessive alcoholic inebriation.
Keywords:
actant, inner form, meaning, identifier, category, modifier, prototype, seme, semantic component, predicate, semantic field, contrastive typology
List of references:
1. Kalita I. V. The Reflection of the Drunkard in the Mirror of Slavonic Phraseology // The Bulletin of Slavonic Cultures [Vestnik slavyanskikh kultur]. 2021. Т. 60. P. 123–135.
2. Krisin L. P. The Modern Russian Language. Lexical Semantics. Lexicology. Phrase-ology. Lexicography. Мoscow: Academia Publishing House, 2009. 240 p.
3. Mathesius V. On Linguistic characterology // The Bulletin of Foreign Linguistics [Novoye v zarubezhnoi lingvistike]. Мoscow, 1989. № 25. P. 18–26.
4. Nida E. Procedures for the Analysis of the Componential Structure of a Single Ref-erential Meaning // The Bulletin of Foreign Linguistics [Novoye v zarubezhnoi lingvis-tike]. Мoscow, 1989. № 25. P. 61–74.
5. Urazayev M. D. A Structural and Semantic Analysis of Alcoholic Inebriation in the Russian, English and German Languages: Author’s Abstract of Dissertation in Philology. Ufa, 2023. 28 p.
6. Frege G. Logic and logical Semantics. Мoscow: Aspect Press Publishers, 2000. 512 p.
7. Chernyak E. P. The Theory of the Inner Form of the Word in Semantic Studies of A. A. Potebnya and W. von Humboldt // the Bulletin of the Kant Baltic Federal University: Philology, Pedagogics, Psychology. 2013. P. 161–166.
8. Chirich I. V. The Repast Vocabulary in the Russian Weltanschauung: Author’s Ab-stract of Dissertation in Philology. Мoscow, 2004. 17 p.
9. Shafikov S. G. Theory of the Semantic Field and Componential Structure of its Units. Ufa: Bashkir State University Publishers, 1999. 92 p.
10. Shafikov S. G. The Semantic Field and Componential Meaning of French Lexical Units for Inebriation // Foreign Languages in the Professional Sphere: Pedagogics, Lin-guistics, Cross-cultural Communication [Inostranniy yazik v professionalnoi sfere: peda-gogika, lingvistika, mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya]. Мoscow, 2022. Part 2. P. 231–239.
11. Shafikov S. G. The Typological Method and Linguistic Typology. Ufa: Bashkir State University Publishers, 2022. URL: https://elib.bashedu.ru/dl/local/ShafikovSG_Tipolog.metod i lingvist.tipolog_mon_2022.pdf.
12. Jackendoff R. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1986. 283 p.
13. Wierzbicka A. Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor, 1985. 368 p.
Lexicographic sources
1. The Russian Map of Words and Word Combination. URL: https://kartaslov.ru/? ysclid=m1t6z7k71k447987445.
2. Kuznetsov S.A. The Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/kuznetsov?ysclid=m1t74k4vkq935937275.
3. The Russian-Czech Dictionary. URL: https://classes.ru/all-czech/dictionary-russian-czech-rucz-term-148257.htm?ysclid=m1t81l2m5563218130.
4. The Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language by S. I. Ozhegov and N. Y. Shvedova. Мoscow: Azbukovnik Publishers, 1999. 944 p.
5. Trishin V.N. The Dictionary of Synonyms of the Russian Language. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/dic_synonims.
6. The Czech-Russian Dictionary. URL: https://glosbe.com/cs/ru.
2. Krisin L. P. The Modern Russian Language. Lexical Semantics. Lexicology. Phrase-ology. Lexicography. Мoscow: Academia Publishing House, 2009. 240 p.
3. Mathesius V. On Linguistic characterology // The Bulletin of Foreign Linguistics [Novoye v zarubezhnoi lingvistike]. Мoscow, 1989. № 25. P. 18–26.
4. Nida E. Procedures for the Analysis of the Componential Structure of a Single Ref-erential Meaning // The Bulletin of Foreign Linguistics [Novoye v zarubezhnoi lingvis-tike]. Мoscow, 1989. № 25. P. 61–74.
5. Urazayev M. D. A Structural and Semantic Analysis of Alcoholic Inebriation in the Russian, English and German Languages: Author’s Abstract of Dissertation in Philology. Ufa, 2023. 28 p.
6. Frege G. Logic and logical Semantics. Мoscow: Aspect Press Publishers, 2000. 512 p.
7. Chernyak E. P. The Theory of the Inner Form of the Word in Semantic Studies of A. A. Potebnya and W. von Humboldt // the Bulletin of the Kant Baltic Federal University: Philology, Pedagogics, Psychology. 2013. P. 161–166.
8. Chirich I. V. The Repast Vocabulary in the Russian Weltanschauung: Author’s Ab-stract of Dissertation in Philology. Мoscow, 2004. 17 p.
9. Shafikov S. G. Theory of the Semantic Field and Componential Structure of its Units. Ufa: Bashkir State University Publishers, 1999. 92 p.
10. Shafikov S. G. The Semantic Field and Componential Meaning of French Lexical Units for Inebriation // Foreign Languages in the Professional Sphere: Pedagogics, Lin-guistics, Cross-cultural Communication [Inostranniy yazik v professionalnoi sfere: peda-gogika, lingvistika, mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya]. Мoscow, 2022. Part 2. P. 231–239.
11. Shafikov S. G. The Typological Method and Linguistic Typology. Ufa: Bashkir State University Publishers, 2022. URL: https://elib.bashedu.ru/dl/local/ShafikovSG_Tipolog.metod i lingvist.tipolog_mon_2022.pdf.
12. Jackendoff R. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1986. 283 p.
13. Wierzbicka A. Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor, 1985. 368 p.
Lexicographic sources
1. The Russian Map of Words and Word Combination. URL: https://kartaslov.ru/? ysclid=m1t6z7k71k447987445.
2. Kuznetsov S.A. The Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/kuznetsov?ysclid=m1t74k4vkq935937275.
3. The Russian-Czech Dictionary. URL: https://classes.ru/all-czech/dictionary-russian-czech-rucz-term-148257.htm?ysclid=m1t81l2m5563218130.
4. The Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language by S. I. Ozhegov and N. Y. Shvedova. Мoscow: Azbukovnik Publishers, 1999. 944 p.
5. Trishin V.N. The Dictionary of Synonyms of the Russian Language. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/dic_synonims.
6. The Czech-Russian Dictionary. URL: https://glosbe.com/cs/ru.
Article.pdf