Dorji Banzarov Buryat state University
LoginРУСENG

BSU bulletin. Philosophy

Bibliographic description:
Stupnikova V. V.
SEMANTICS OF THE DRAGON: PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION (BASED ON THE MATERIALS OF ORACLE BONE INSCRIPTIONS) // BSU bulletin. Philosophy. - 2016. №3. Философия. Philosophy. - С. 127-134.
Title:
SEMANTICS OF THE DRAGON: PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION (BASED ON THE MATERIALS OF ORACLE BONE INSCRIPTIONS)
Financing:
Codes:
DOI: 10.18101/1994-0866-2016-3-127-134UDK: 811.581
Annotation:
In the article we have made an attempt to systematize different inscriptions of ―long‖ (dragon) on the oracle bones and tortoise shells. Dragon is one of the main symbols of China, the character of various myths, ancient classical texts and novels. The semantics of Chinese dragon have been changed over thousands of years. Due to the fact that interpretations of its origin and functions are contradictory, it seems appropriate to analyse this symbol from the standpoint of historical development. Basing on oracle inscriptions we have presented the main concepts of Chinese researchers on origin of the Dragon symbol. Philosophical and linguistic interpretation of the Dragon symbol would con- tribute to a better understanding of the processes taking place in China, such as forma- tion and development of nationhood, culture and literature.
Keywords:
etymology of ―long‖ (Dragon) hieroglyph, oracle bones, the Dragon symbol, the genesis of Dragon symbol.
List of references:
1. Wang Yuxin, Yang Shengnan. Jiaguxue yibai nian [One Hundred Years of Jiaguxue]. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 1999. 717 p. (Chinese)

2. Kravtsova M. Dukhovnaya kul'tura Kitaya [China’s Spiritual Culture]. Moscow: Vos- tochnaya literature Publ., 2008. V. 3. Pp. 521–523.

3. Chen Weizhan. Er shi yi shiji jiaguwen yanjiu zhi zhanwang [Prospects for the De- velopment of Oracle Bones Research in the 21st Century]. Shantou daxue xuebao. 2001. V. 17. No. 2. Pp. 11–16, 23. (Chinese)

4. Jiaguwen bian [Oracle Bones' Edition]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju Publ., 1965. 976 p. (Chinese)

5. Wang Liquan. Zhonghua long wenhua de qiyuan yu yanbian [The Origin and Evolution of the Chinese Dragon Culture]. Beijing: Qixian chubanshe Publ., 2010. 207 p. (Chi- nese)

6. Wei Juxian. Gu shi yanjiu [Ancient History Research]. Shanghai: Shanghai wenyi chubanshe Publ., 1990. 386 p. (Chinese)

7. Zhonghua long wenhua cidian [Dictionary ofChinese Dragon Culture]. Beijing: Zhongguo wenshi chubanshe Publ., 2002. 629 p. (Chinese)

8. He Xin. Gu jing xin jie. V. 4. Long: shenhua yu zhenxiang [The New Interpretation of the Classic Texts. V. 4. Dragon: Myths and Facts]. Beijing: Shishi chubanshe Publ., 2002.436 p. (Chinese)

9. Pang Jin. Zhongguo xiangrui: Long [Good Omens of China: Dragon]. Xi'an: Shanxi renmin chubanshe Publ., 2012. 220 p. (Chinese)

10. Wang Dong.Long shi shenme: Zhongguo fuhao xin jiemi 龙是什么: 中国符号新解密 [What is Dragon: the New Decryption of Chinese Symbols]. Beijing: Zhongyang bianyi chubanshe Publ., 2012. 412 p. (Chinese)

11. Xin jiaguwen bian (zengding ben) [New Edition of Oracle Bones (revised edition)].Fuzhou: Fuzhian renmin chubanshe Publ., 2014. 1086 p. (Chinese)

12. Starostina A. B. Spory o drakonakh – 2006 [Disputes about Dragons – 2006]. Che- lovek i kul'tura Vostoka: issledovaniya i perevody — People and Culture of the East: Stu- dies and Translations. Moscow, 2010. Pp. 95–111.

13. Zhongguo long, yao quxiao? [Is it necessary to Abandon the Chinese Dragon?].SOHU.com. Available at: http://news.sohu.com/s2006/06long/ (April 17, 2014). (Chinese)