Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture
Bibliographic description:
, LANGUAGE SYNERGY // Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture. - 2020. №4. . - С. 110-116.
Title:
LANGUAGE SYNERGY
Financing:
Codes:
Annotation:
The purpose of this work is to understand and discuss linguistics gene or its synergy in the Mongolian language, comparing and analyzing the linguists’ findings and paradigms on language and speech, and their correlation. It is particularly significant to differentiate and understand the analysis of language and linguistics and their correlation. The periodic linguists and experts have paid their attention to precise explanations to in- terpret characteristics of language and linguistic throughout the time correctly because of the essential importance of its depth of relevance.
However, some linguists separate language and linguistics from each other, considering those linguistics as a general concept. However, language is specific, stating "the two are unrelated and separate phenomena without coherence," whereas other experts claim that “Language and linguistics are two sides of the same phenomenon, and need not be differ- entiated." To find a definite answer to this question and uncertainty, we have taken into account the work about the correlation of language and linguistics from the universal ap- proach, which observes the interaction process of a thing and a man, exploring the triple structure theory as “linguistics -thing-language". The structure "Linguistics-thing-lan- guage" is explained by the triple theory as "being-gene-consciousness," specifically, that being is connected to linguistics, the gene or the synergy is a thing, and consciousness relates to language, or simply “Being — linguistics, Synergy — Thing, Consciousness- Language." We further broke it down to the Mongolian language, and cultural aspect of that synergy as the thing translates to “ethics and culture," as well as “wisdom” and “con- scious mind." In such, we aimed to discuss this concept in Mongolian language synergy from the perspectives from international viewpoints as well as our native Mongolian lin- guists and experts and look at the triple structure theory.
However, some linguists separate language and linguistics from each other, considering those linguistics as a general concept. However, language is specific, stating "the two are unrelated and separate phenomena without coherence," whereas other experts claim that “Language and linguistics are two sides of the same phenomenon, and need not be differ- entiated." To find a definite answer to this question and uncertainty, we have taken into account the work about the correlation of language and linguistics from the universal ap- proach, which observes the interaction process of a thing and a man, exploring the triple structure theory as “linguistics -thing-language". The structure "Linguistics-thing-lan- guage" is explained by the triple theory as "being-gene-consciousness," specifically, that being is connected to linguistics, the gene or the synergy is a thing, and consciousness relates to language, or simply “Being — linguistics, Synergy — Thing, Consciousness- Language." We further broke it down to the Mongolian language, and cultural aspect of that synergy as the thing translates to “ethics and culture," as well as “wisdom” and “con- scious mind." In such, we aimed to discuss this concept in Mongolian language synergy from the perspectives from international viewpoints as well as our native Mongolian lin- guists and experts and look at the triple structure theory.
Keywords:
Language, linguistics, correlation, instrument, gene, and synergy.
List of references:
Выготский Л. С. Избранные психологические исследования. М.: АПН РСФСР,
Godel R. Les sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique generale de F. de Saussure. Geneve Paris, 1957.
Дэмчигдорж Ч. Эрдэнэт толь хэмээх шастир оршивой (Vol. 1). Улаанбаатар: ШУА Түүхийн хүрээлэн, 1995.
Жадамба Б. Нэг ертөнцийн хандлага. Лавай, 2013. № 9. С. 7–17.
Жадамба Б. Амь амьдрахуй ухаан. Улаанбаатар: "Гэрэлт судар" ХХК, 2017.
Леонтьев А. А. Язык, речь, речевая деятельность. М.: Просвещение, 1969. 214 c.
Лувсанвандан Ш. Монгол хэлний авиазүйн онол, практикийн асуудлууд. Улаан- баатар, 2002.
Лувсанвандан Ш. Монгол хэлний бүтээвэр, үг, үгүүлбэрийн судлал (Vol. VII). Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг, 2010.
Лувсанвандан Ш. Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний бүтэц (Vol. III). Улаанбаатар, 2019.
Нагаанбуу Н. Монгол гурвал онол. Улаанбаатар, 1999.
Павлов В. М. О противоречиях в языке (Составная лексическая единица в её от-
ношении к синтаксической конструкции) // Ленинизм и теоретические проблемы языко- знания. М.: Наука, 1970. С. 81–96.
Соссюр Ф. Де. Курс общей лингвистики, изданный Ш. Бальи и А. Сешеэ при участии А. Ридлингер / пер. с фр. изд. А. М. Сухотина; под ред. и с примеч. Р. И. Шор; вводная статья Д. Н. Введенского. М.: Соцэкгиз, 1933. 272 с.
Godel R. Les sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique generale de F. de Saussure. Geneve Paris, 1957.
Дэмчигдорж Ч. Эрдэнэт толь хэмээх шастир оршивой (Vol. 1). Улаанбаатар: ШУА Түүхийн хүрээлэн, 1995.
Жадамба Б. Нэг ертөнцийн хандлага. Лавай, 2013. № 9. С. 7–17.
Жадамба Б. Амь амьдрахуй ухаан. Улаанбаатар: "Гэрэлт судар" ХХК, 2017.
Леонтьев А. А. Язык, речь, речевая деятельность. М.: Просвещение, 1969. 214 c.
Лувсанвандан Ш. Монгол хэлний авиазүйн онол, практикийн асуудлууд. Улаан- баатар, 2002.
Лувсанвандан Ш. Монгол хэлний бүтээвэр, үг, үгүүлбэрийн судлал (Vol. VII). Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг, 2010.
Лувсанвандан Ш. Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний бүтэц (Vol. III). Улаанбаатар, 2019.
Нагаанбуу Н. Монгол гурвал онол. Улаанбаатар, 1999.
Павлов В. М. О противоречиях в языке (Составная лексическая единица в её от-
ношении к синтаксической конструкции) // Ленинизм и теоретические проблемы языко- знания. М.: Наука, 1970. С. 81–96.
Соссюр Ф. Де. Курс общей лингвистики, изданный Ш. Бальи и А. Сешеэ при участии А. Ридлингер / пер. с фр. изд. А. М. Сухотина; под ред. и с примеч. Р. И. Шор; вводная статья Д. Н. Введенского. М.: Соцэкгиз, 1933. 272 с.
Article.pdf