BSU bulletin. Philosophy
Bibliographic description:
ABOUT THE ROLE OF THE CONCEPT OF "FUTURE" IN SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE // BSU bulletin. Philosophy. - 2016. №6. Философия. Philosophy. - С. 142-155.
Title:
ABOUT THE ROLE OF THE CONCEPT OF "FUTURE" IN SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE
Financing:
Codes:
Annotation:
Trying to understand the situation in Russian social knowledge leads to the conclusion, that there is the necessity of a new metanarrative, which has been "abolished" in the last century. For its research and formation the significant changes in the minds of scientists and science organization are required, the scale of these changes are directly proportional to the depth of crisis in our country and in the whole world. We consider the future as one of the variants of this metanarrative, the concept of future is understood as a set of all causal consequences of the present. The article reveals the presence of this concept in key social and philosophical texts, as well as its fundamental relationship with the activities and decision-making. We have formulated and justified the assumption that the concept of "future" can effectively organize the flow of social facts, events, theories, and also take out from them the material for testable hypotheses in the humanities and social sciences.
Keywords:
future, social knowledge, concept, metanarrative theory, problems of science.
List of references:
1. Razumov V. I., Sizikov V. P. Spetsifika ob"ekta i metoda sotsial'noi teorii [The Specifics of the Object and Method of Social Theory]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo — Personality. Culture. Society. 2008. — V. 10. No. 3–4 (42–43). Pp.107–117.
2. Razumov V. I., Sizikov V. P. Novaya epokha i filosofiya: ot problematizatsii k intuitsiyam i sintezu [A New Era and Philosophy: from Problematization to Intuition and Synthesis]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2015. V. 1. No. 4 (26). Pp. 57–68.
3. Razumov V. I. Nuzhna li nam deistvitel'no sotsial'naya teoriya ili prodolzhim zanimat'sya sotsial'no-filosofskoi esseistikoi? Otvet moim retsenzentam [Do We Need a Truly Social Theory or Will Continue to Engage in Social and Philosophical Essays? The Answer to My Reviewers]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo — Personality. Culture. Society. 2010. V. 12. No. 1 (53–54). Pp. 104–107.
4. Orekhov A. M. Sotsial'naya teoriya: k probleme samoopredeleniya i struktury [Social
Theory: To the Problem of Self-Determination and Structure]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo
— Personality. Culture. Society. 2006. No. 4 (32). Pp. 82–94.
5. Tlostanova M. V. «Obshchestvo rabov» V. I. Razumova i «Institutsional'naya koshka» A. M. Orekhova, ili Zachem nuzhna sotsial'naya teoriya, i kakaya? ["The Society of Slaves" by V. I. Razumov and A. M. Orekhov’s "Institutional Cat", or Why Do We Need Social Theory, and What Kind of?]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo — Personality. Culture. Society. 2009. V. 11. No. 4 (51–52). Pp.130–135.
6. Tlostanova M. V. Problema cheloveka v postkontinental'noi filosofii [The Problem of the Human in Post-Continental Philosophy]. Voprosy sotsial'noi teorii — Problems of Social Theory. 2015. V. 7. No. 1–2. Pp. 73–95.
7. Shental' A. Madina Tlostanova: «Kolonial'nost' perezhivet kolonializm» (interv'yu) [Madina Tlostanova: "Coloniality Will Outlast Colonialism" (interview)]. Teoriya i praktika — Theory and Practice. Available at: http://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/8258-madina-tlostanova-o- dekolonialnom-povorote (accessed September 20, 2016.
8. Sokolov M. M., Titaev T. D. Provintsial'naya i tuzemnaya nauka [Provincial and Indigenous Science]. Antropologicheskii forum — Anthropological Forum. 2013. No. 19. Pp. 239–275.
9. Rozov N. S. «Provintsializm», «tuzemstvo» i faktory intellektual'noi «stolichnosti» v sotsial'nom poznanii ["Provincialism", "Indigenousity" and the Factors of Intellectual "Capitalness" in Social Cognition]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal — Journal of Sociology. 2016. V.
22. No. 1. Pp. 8–25.
10. Bermus A. G. et al. Forum «Provintsial'naya i tuzemnaya nauka» (obsuzhdenie stat'i M. M.Sokolova i K. D. Titaeva) [Forum "Provincial and Indigenous Science" (discussion of the article by M. M. Sokolova and K. D. Titaeva)]. Antropologicheskii forum — Anthropological Forum. 2013. No. 19. Pp. 9– 236.
11. Rozov N. S. Idei i intellektualy v potoke istorii [Ideas and Intellectuals in the Flow of
History]. Novosibirsk: Manuskript Publ., 2016. 344 p.
12. Kaneman D. Dumai medlenno… reshai bystro [Think Slow ... Decide Quickly]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2014. 656 p.
13. Nevedimov D. Religiya deneg, ili Lekarstvo ot rynochnoi ekonomiki [The Religion of Money or Medicine from the Market Economy]. Novyi sotsializm XXI veka — New Socialism of the 21st Century. Available at: http://novsoc.ru/nevedimov-religiya-deneg/ (September 20, 2016).
14. Katasonov V. Yu. Religiya deneg. Dukhovno-religioznye osnovy kapitalizma [The Religion of Money. Spiritual and Religious Foundations of Capitalism]. Moscow: Kislorod Publ., 2013. 408 p.
15. Rothkopf D. Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. Moscow: AST, Astrel Publ., 2010. 475 p.
16. Beer S. Brain of The Firm. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons edition, 1972.
17. Mekhanik A. Prestizh mogushchestva i nauka [The Prestige of Power and Science].
Available at: http://expert.ru/expert/2015/28/prestizh-moguschestva-i-nauka/ (September 20, 2016).
18. Kuznetsov A. Rossiiskie uchenye nachinayut aktsii protesta [Russian Scientists Begin to Protest]. Available at: http://www.profile.ru/obsch/item/110280-rossijskie-uchenye- nachinayut-aktsii-protesta (September 20, 2016)
19. Zamglavy RAN: nyneshnie tendentsii v upravlenii naukoi sozdayut bol'shie riski [Deputy Head of RAS: The Current Trends in Science Management Create Great Risks]. RIA Novosti — RIA News. Available at: https://ria.ru/interview/20160819/1474792035.html (September 20, 2016).
20. Shtern B. et al. Ot peremeny ministra kurs ne menyaetsya? [By Change of Minister the Course is not Changed?]. Troitskii variant – Nauka — Troitsky Variant – Science. Available at: http://trv-science.ru/2016/08/23/ot-peremeny-ministra-kurs-ne-menyaetsya/ (September 20, 2016).
21. Moiseev N. N. Rasstavanie s prostotoi [Breakup with Simplicity]. Moscow: Agraf Publ., 1998. 480 p.
22. Moiseev N. N., Aleksandrov V. V., Tarko A. M., Moiseev N. N. Chelovek i biosfera [Man and the Biosphere]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1985. 272 p.
23. Makar'eva A. Chtob ne obrushit' mirozdan'e [Not to Bring down the Universe]. Nauka i zhizn' — Science and Life. Available at: http://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/16294/ (September 20, 2016).
24. Kolpakova T. V., Kapishnikova V. A. Problema ukhudsheniya zdorov'ya naseleniya KNR kak posledstvie ekologicheskogo krizisa [The Problem of Deterioration of China’s Population Health as a Consequence of Environmental Crisis]. Rossiya i Kitai: Problemy strategicheskogo vzaimodeistviya — Russia and China: The Problems of Strategic Cooperation. 2016. No. 17. Pp. 93–96.
25. Sozinova S. S., Kolpakova T. V. Agroekologicheskaya problema v KNR [The Agroecological Problem in China]. Rossiya i Kitai: Problemy strategicheskogo vzaimodeistviya — Russia and China: The Problems of Strategic Cooperation. 2016. No. 17. Pp. 96–99.
26. Balashova A. A. Osobennosti ispol'zovaniya uglya v Kitae i vozmozhnye puti snizheniya negativnogo vozdeistviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu [The Features of Coal Use in China and Possible Ways to Reduce the Negative Impact on the Environment]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' — National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2010. No. 5 (62). Pp. 92–96.
27. Dobzhansky Th. Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.
The American Biology Teacher. 1973. No. 35 (March). Pp. 125–129.
28. Khaustov D. S. Teorema Tomasa: zhizn' odnoi idei [Thomas Theorem: The Life of One Idea]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2014. No. 3 (21). Pp. 38–45.
29. Goryunov A. V. Modal'nye formy predstavlenii o budushchem [Modal Forms of Ideas about the Future]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2011. V. 2. No. 4 (10). Pp. 33–40.
30. Momdzhyan K. Kh. Protsess prinyatiya reshenii i ego mesto v deyatel'nosti lyudei
[Decision-Making Process and Its Place in Human Activity]. Al'manakh Prostranstvo i Vremya
— Space and Time Almanac. 2015. V. 9. No. 2. 10 p.
31. Frolov I. T. Determinizm i teleologiya [Determinism and Teleology]. Voprosy filosofii
— Problems of Philosophy. 1958. No. 2. Pp. 35–49.
32. Kunin E. V. Logika sluchaya. O prirode i proiskhozhdenii biologicheskoi evolyutsii [The Logic of Chance. The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2014. 527 p.
33. Vershinin S. E. Zhizn' — eto nadezhda: Vvedenie v filosofiyu Ernsta Blokha [Life is a Hope: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Ernst Bloch]. Ekaterinburg: Humanitarian University Publ., 2001. 304 p.
34. Zhigmytov Ts. V., Sandakova L. G. Razvitie obshchestva i zadachi sotsial'noi kognitivistiki [The Development of Society and The Problem of Social Cognitive Science]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2016. No. 4 (in print).
35. Goryunov A. V. Obshchestvennyi ideal v kognitivnoi strukture proekta [Social Ideal in the Cognitive Structure of a Project]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura — Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 8–12.
2. Razumov V. I., Sizikov V. P. Novaya epokha i filosofiya: ot problematizatsii k intuitsiyam i sintezu [A New Era and Philosophy: from Problematization to Intuition and Synthesis]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2015. V. 1. No. 4 (26). Pp. 57–68.
3. Razumov V. I. Nuzhna li nam deistvitel'no sotsial'naya teoriya ili prodolzhim zanimat'sya sotsial'no-filosofskoi esseistikoi? Otvet moim retsenzentam [Do We Need a Truly Social Theory or Will Continue to Engage in Social and Philosophical Essays? The Answer to My Reviewers]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo — Personality. Culture. Society. 2010. V. 12. No. 1 (53–54). Pp. 104–107.
4. Orekhov A. M. Sotsial'naya teoriya: k probleme samoopredeleniya i struktury [Social
Theory: To the Problem of Self-Determination and Structure]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo
— Personality. Culture. Society. 2006. No. 4 (32). Pp. 82–94.
5. Tlostanova M. V. «Obshchestvo rabov» V. I. Razumova i «Institutsional'naya koshka» A. M. Orekhova, ili Zachem nuzhna sotsial'naya teoriya, i kakaya? ["The Society of Slaves" by V. I. Razumov and A. M. Orekhov’s "Institutional Cat", or Why Do We Need Social Theory, and What Kind of?]. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo — Personality. Culture. Society. 2009. V. 11. No. 4 (51–52). Pp.130–135.
6. Tlostanova M. V. Problema cheloveka v postkontinental'noi filosofii [The Problem of the Human in Post-Continental Philosophy]. Voprosy sotsial'noi teorii — Problems of Social Theory. 2015. V. 7. No. 1–2. Pp. 73–95.
7. Shental' A. Madina Tlostanova: «Kolonial'nost' perezhivet kolonializm» (interv'yu) [Madina Tlostanova: "Coloniality Will Outlast Colonialism" (interview)]. Teoriya i praktika — Theory and Practice. Available at: http://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/8258-madina-tlostanova-o- dekolonialnom-povorote (accessed September 20, 2016.
8. Sokolov M. M., Titaev T. D. Provintsial'naya i tuzemnaya nauka [Provincial and Indigenous Science]. Antropologicheskii forum — Anthropological Forum. 2013. No. 19. Pp. 239–275.
9. Rozov N. S. «Provintsializm», «tuzemstvo» i faktory intellektual'noi «stolichnosti» v sotsial'nom poznanii ["Provincialism", "Indigenousity" and the Factors of Intellectual "Capitalness" in Social Cognition]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal — Journal of Sociology. 2016. V.
22. No. 1. Pp. 8–25.
10. Bermus A. G. et al. Forum «Provintsial'naya i tuzemnaya nauka» (obsuzhdenie stat'i M. M.Sokolova i K. D. Titaeva) [Forum "Provincial and Indigenous Science" (discussion of the article by M. M. Sokolova and K. D. Titaeva)]. Antropologicheskii forum — Anthropological Forum. 2013. No. 19. Pp. 9– 236.
11. Rozov N. S. Idei i intellektualy v potoke istorii [Ideas and Intellectuals in the Flow of
History]. Novosibirsk: Manuskript Publ., 2016. 344 p.
12. Kaneman D. Dumai medlenno… reshai bystro [Think Slow ... Decide Quickly]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2014. 656 p.
13. Nevedimov D. Religiya deneg, ili Lekarstvo ot rynochnoi ekonomiki [The Religion of Money or Medicine from the Market Economy]. Novyi sotsializm XXI veka — New Socialism of the 21st Century. Available at: http://novsoc.ru/nevedimov-religiya-deneg/ (September 20, 2016).
14. Katasonov V. Yu. Religiya deneg. Dukhovno-religioznye osnovy kapitalizma [The Religion of Money. Spiritual and Religious Foundations of Capitalism]. Moscow: Kislorod Publ., 2013. 408 p.
15. Rothkopf D. Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. Moscow: AST, Astrel Publ., 2010. 475 p.
16. Beer S. Brain of The Firm. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons edition, 1972.
17. Mekhanik A. Prestizh mogushchestva i nauka [The Prestige of Power and Science].
Available at: http://expert.ru/expert/2015/28/prestizh-moguschestva-i-nauka/ (September 20, 2016).
18. Kuznetsov A. Rossiiskie uchenye nachinayut aktsii protesta [Russian Scientists Begin to Protest]. Available at: http://www.profile.ru/obsch/item/110280-rossijskie-uchenye- nachinayut-aktsii-protesta (September 20, 2016)
19. Zamglavy RAN: nyneshnie tendentsii v upravlenii naukoi sozdayut bol'shie riski [Deputy Head of RAS: The Current Trends in Science Management Create Great Risks]. RIA Novosti — RIA News. Available at: https://ria.ru/interview/20160819/1474792035.html (September 20, 2016).
20. Shtern B. et al. Ot peremeny ministra kurs ne menyaetsya? [By Change of Minister the Course is not Changed?]. Troitskii variant – Nauka — Troitsky Variant – Science. Available at: http://trv-science.ru/2016/08/23/ot-peremeny-ministra-kurs-ne-menyaetsya/ (September 20, 2016).
21. Moiseev N. N. Rasstavanie s prostotoi [Breakup with Simplicity]. Moscow: Agraf Publ., 1998. 480 p.
22. Moiseev N. N., Aleksandrov V. V., Tarko A. M., Moiseev N. N. Chelovek i biosfera [Man and the Biosphere]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1985. 272 p.
23. Makar'eva A. Chtob ne obrushit' mirozdan'e [Not to Bring down the Universe]. Nauka i zhizn' — Science and Life. Available at: http://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/16294/ (September 20, 2016).
24. Kolpakova T. V., Kapishnikova V. A. Problema ukhudsheniya zdorov'ya naseleniya KNR kak posledstvie ekologicheskogo krizisa [The Problem of Deterioration of China’s Population Health as a Consequence of Environmental Crisis]. Rossiya i Kitai: Problemy strategicheskogo vzaimodeistviya — Russia and China: The Problems of Strategic Cooperation. 2016. No. 17. Pp. 93–96.
25. Sozinova S. S., Kolpakova T. V. Agroekologicheskaya problema v KNR [The Agroecological Problem in China]. Rossiya i Kitai: Problemy strategicheskogo vzaimodeistviya — Russia and China: The Problems of Strategic Cooperation. 2016. No. 17. Pp. 96–99.
26. Balashova A. A. Osobennosti ispol'zovaniya uglya v Kitae i vozmozhnye puti snizheniya negativnogo vozdeistviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu [The Features of Coal Use in China and Possible Ways to Reduce the Negative Impact on the Environment]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' — National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2010. No. 5 (62). Pp. 92–96.
27. Dobzhansky Th. Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.
The American Biology Teacher. 1973. No. 35 (March). Pp. 125–129.
28. Khaustov D. S. Teorema Tomasa: zhizn' odnoi idei [Thomas Theorem: The Life of One Idea]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2014. No. 3 (21). Pp. 38–45.
29. Goryunov A. V. Modal'nye formy predstavlenii o budushchem [Modal Forms of Ideas about the Future]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2011. V. 2. No. 4 (10). Pp. 33–40.
30. Momdzhyan K. Kh. Protsess prinyatiya reshenii i ego mesto v deyatel'nosti lyudei
[Decision-Making Process and Its Place in Human Activity]. Al'manakh Prostranstvo i Vremya
— Space and Time Almanac. 2015. V. 9. No. 2. 10 p.
31. Frolov I. T. Determinizm i teleologiya [Determinism and Teleology]. Voprosy filosofii
— Problems of Philosophy. 1958. No. 2. Pp. 35–49.
32. Kunin E. V. Logika sluchaya. O prirode i proiskhozhdenii biologicheskoi evolyutsii [The Logic of Chance. The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2014. 527 p.
33. Vershinin S. E. Zhizn' — eto nadezhda: Vvedenie v filosofiyu Ernsta Blokha [Life is a Hope: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Ernst Bloch]. Ekaterinburg: Humanitarian University Publ., 2001. 304 p.
34. Zhigmytov Ts. V., Sandakova L. G. Razvitie obshchestva i zadachi sotsial'noi kognitivistiki [The Development of Society and The Problem of Social Cognitive Science]. Idei i idealy — Ideas and Ideals. 2016. No. 4 (in print).
35. Goryunov A. V. Obshchestvennyi ideal v kognitivnoi strukture proekta [Social Ideal in the Cognitive Structure of a Project]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura — Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 8–12.
Article.pdf