Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture
Bibliographic description:
THE BURYAT PHYTONYMS IN THE ONOMASIOLOGICAL ASPECT // Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture. - 2020. №4. . - С. 132-136.
Title:
THE BURYAT PHYTONYMS IN THE ONOMASIOLOGICAL ASPECT
Financing:
Codes:
Annotation:
A distinctive feature of modern linguistics is the formation of new trends. One of the most important is onomasiology — the science of the theory of nomination. It con- siders the meaning of a word from the content plane to the expression plane. Plant names are an interesting research subject, because they are part of the main vocabulary of any language and have ancient roots. It reflects the traditional activities and culture of the peo- ple, their сonception of the world of plants, customs and beliefs. The article considers the phytonyms in the onomasiological aspect, describes the main ways of associations of plants names. The types of motivation and the leading signs in the names of the words under study, the principles of phytonym nomination, and the degree of their productivity are considered. The motivational signs of the subject underlying the name in different lan- guages are not the same. We see the prospects for further research in a more detailed study. The identified principles and motives for nomination of plants in the Buryat language re- veal the specifics of the people's worldview, practical experience and value system.
Keywords:
Buryat language; onomasiological approach; phytonyms; principles of nomination; types of motivation.
List of references:
Abdimomunova A. O. On some fundamental aspects of the formation of the theory of language nomination. URL: https://docplayer.ru/163755800-O-nekotoryh-osnovopolagayush- chih-momentah-stanovleniya-teorii-yazykovoy-nominacii.html) (date of access: 27.12.2019).
Batorova S. M., Badmaeva L. D. About the Buryat-Mongolian names of plants used in Tibetan medicine // Sanzheevskie readings-4: Materials of Vseros. scientific. conf. Ulan-Ude, 1999. P. 26–27.
Budaev Ts. B. About floristic terminology (based on the materials of the Buryat, Mon- golian and Kalmyk languages) // Proceedings of the BKNII. Ser.: oriental studies. Ulan-Ude: Bur. book publishing house, 1960. Issue. 3. P. 80–88.
Krylov G. A. Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language. SPb.: LLC ‘Victoria Plus’. 2004.
Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language. M.: Progress. M. R. Fasmer. 1964–1973.
Lukyanova I. V. Dialectal phytonomy in the cognitive-onomasiological aspect: author. dis. Cand. ... filol. Sciences. Tomsk, 2018. 24 p.
Panasenko N. I. Proper names in the names of medicinal plants (onomasiological approach) // Philological research: Philology and medicine, 2014. № 11. P. 218–236.
Rupysheva L. E. The names of plants in the Buryat language (floronymic vocabulary.) Ulan- Ude: IPK FGBOU VSGIK, 2016. 189 p.
Sanzheev G. D., Orlovskaya M. N., Shevernina Z. V. Etymological Dictionary of Mongolian Languages: in 3 volumes / Institute of Oriental Studies RAS. Ch. ed. G. S. Sanzheev, ed. L. R. Kontse- vich, V. I. Rassadin, Ya. D. Lehman. Volume I. [A — E]. Moscow, 2015.
Seydametova N. S. Features of the onomasiological structure of plant names in the Crimean Tatar language // Mova i culture. (Science Journal). K.: Vidavnichiy dim of Dmitry Burago, 2013. Vol. 16. T. I (163). P. 198–204.
Sodnompilova M. M. Traditional medicine of Mongolian peoples: traditions of phytother- apy // Baikal meetings — VIII, historical and cultural heritage of the region as a factor of socio-eco- nomic development. 2014. P. 180–192.
Tsyrenov B. D., Rupysheva L. E. Russian-Latin-Buryat dictionary of plant and animal names. Ulan-Ude: Publishing house "Belig", 2005. 52 p.
Batorova S. M., Badmaeva L. D. About the Buryat-Mongolian names of plants used in Tibetan medicine // Sanzheevskie readings-4: Materials of Vseros. scientific. conf. Ulan-Ude, 1999. P. 26–27.
Budaev Ts. B. About floristic terminology (based on the materials of the Buryat, Mon- golian and Kalmyk languages) // Proceedings of the BKNII. Ser.: oriental studies. Ulan-Ude: Bur. book publishing house, 1960. Issue. 3. P. 80–88.
Krylov G. A. Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language. SPb.: LLC ‘Victoria Plus’. 2004.
Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language. M.: Progress. M. R. Fasmer. 1964–1973.
Lukyanova I. V. Dialectal phytonomy in the cognitive-onomasiological aspect: author. dis. Cand. ... filol. Sciences. Tomsk, 2018. 24 p.
Panasenko N. I. Proper names in the names of medicinal plants (onomasiological approach) // Philological research: Philology and medicine, 2014. № 11. P. 218–236.
Rupysheva L. E. The names of plants in the Buryat language (floronymic vocabulary.) Ulan- Ude: IPK FGBOU VSGIK, 2016. 189 p.
Sanzheev G. D., Orlovskaya M. N., Shevernina Z. V. Etymological Dictionary of Mongolian Languages: in 3 volumes / Institute of Oriental Studies RAS. Ch. ed. G. S. Sanzheev, ed. L. R. Kontse- vich, V. I. Rassadin, Ya. D. Lehman. Volume I. [A — E]. Moscow, 2015.
Seydametova N. S. Features of the onomasiological structure of plant names in the Crimean Tatar language // Mova i culture. (Science Journal). K.: Vidavnichiy dim of Dmitry Burago, 2013. Vol. 16. T. I (163). P. 198–204.
Sodnompilova M. M. Traditional medicine of Mongolian peoples: traditions of phytother- apy // Baikal meetings — VIII, historical and cultural heritage of the region as a factor of socio-eco- nomic development. 2014. P. 180–192.
Tsyrenov B. D., Rupysheva L. E. Russian-Latin-Buryat dictionary of plant and animal names. Ulan-Ude: Publishing house "Belig", 2005. 52 p.
Article.pdf