Dorji Banzarov Buryat state University
LoginРУСENG

BSU bulletin. Philosophy

Bibliographic description:
Kol’tsova N. Z.
MIKHAIL A. BULGAKOV AS A "VERBAL MOVIE MASTER" (about cinematic reading of "The Master and Margarita" novel) // BSU bulletin. Philosophy. - 2016. №5. Филология. Philology. - С. 165-173.
Title:
MIKHAIL A. BULGAKOV AS A "VERBAL MOVIE MASTER" (about cinematic reading of "The Master and Margarita" novel)
Financing:
Codes:
DOI: 10.18101/1994-0866-2016-5-165-173UDK: 821.161.1.0
Annotation:
The article discusses Mikhail A. Bulgakov‘s novel in terms of its cinematic nature. Attention is given not so much to typological interaction or genetic relationship be- tween the work of Bulgakov and the films of the 1920s, as to the cinematic "histo- ry" of the work. We investigate the "cinematic thinking" of the writer, defining the features of composition, the principles of introducing characters in the text, meth- ods to create image of the world. It is suggested that the movie have been acted as a source of motifs and imagery for the writer, a sample of artistic text at the level of space-time correlation, and way to create images of characters. It is emphasized that visual rhythm takes on special importance in Bulgakov's text.
Keywords:
installation, rhythm, cinema, movies, cinematography.
List of references:
1. Bulgakov M. A. Yurii Slezkin. Bulgakov M. A. Sobranie sochinenii — Collected Ar- ticles. In 8 v. Moscow: AST; Astrel' Publ., 2009. V. 3.

2. Bulgakova E. S. Dnevnik. 1933–1940 [The Diary. 1933–1940]. Vospominaniya o Mikhaile Bulgakove: E. S. Bulgakova, T. N. Lappa, L. E. Belozerskaya — Memories of Mikhail Bulgakov: E. S. Bulgakov, T. N. Lappa, L. E. Belozerskaya. Moscow: AST; Astrel' Publ., 2006. Pp. 13–294.

3. Vavulina A. V., Kol'tsova N. Z. «Master i Margarita»: roman ili opera? (k voprosu o muzykal'noi prirode bulgakovskogo romana) ["The Master and Margarita": a Novel or an Opera? (about musical nature of Bulgakov's novel)]. Yazyk, kul'tura: aktual'nye problemy izucheniya i prepodavaniya — Language, Culture: Actual Problems of Studying and Teaching. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 2013. No. 9. Pp. 235–255.

4. Gasparov B. M. Literaturnye leitmotivy. Ocherki russkoi literatury XX v. [Literary Motifs. Essays on Russian Literature of the 20th Century]. Moscow: Nauka, Vostochnaya liter- atura Publ., 1994. 304 p.

5. Zamyatin E. Novaya russkaya proza. T. 5. Trudnoe masterstvo [New Russian Prose. V. 5. Hard Mastery]. Zamyatin E. I. Sobranie sochineniy — Collected Works. In 5 v. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 2011. 559 p.

6. Mart'yanova I. A. Kinovek russkogo teksta: paradoks literaturnoi kinematografich- nosti [The Century of Russian Text in Cinema: the Paradox of Cinematic Literature]. St Pe- tersburg: Saga Publ., 2001. 224 p.

7. Metts K. Zerkala v kino [Mirrors in Cinema]. Kinovedcheskie zapiski — Notes on Film Studies.1992. No. 3.

8. Mints Z. G. Poetika russkogo simvolizma [Poetics of Russian Symbolism]. St Pe- tersburg: Iskusstvo–SPB Publ., 2004. 480 p.

9. Petrovskii M. Master i gorod. Kievskie konteksty Mikhaila Bulgakova [Master and the City. Kiev Contexts of Mikhail Bulgakov]. 2nd ed., rev. and ext. St Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publ., 2008. 464 p.

10. Etkind A. Tolkovanie puteshestvii. Rossiya i Amerika v travelogakh i intertekstakh [Interpretation of Travel. Russia and America in Travelogues and Intertexts]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2001. 496 p.

11. Yablokov E. A. Khudozhestvennyi mir Mikhaila Bulgakova [The Artistic World of Mikhail Bulgakov]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury Publ., 2001. 424 p. (Studia philologica).